This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0885066609340501v1 24/5/283    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rudraraju, P. Articles by Eisen, L. A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rudraraju, P. Articles by Eisen, L. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB CARBON DIOXIDE Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Analytic Review: Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Position: A Narrative Review

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York

Lewis Ari Eisen, MD

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, eisen{at}gmail.com

Endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion is the primary method of definitive airway protection and control in critically ill patients. Detection of ETT malposition in a timely fashion is crucial in both elective and emergent intubation. In this review, we describe classic tests and highlight several new technologies that may assist the practitioner in determining ETT position within the esophago-tracheal complex, namely ultrasonographic and impedance-based methods. Strengths and weaknesses of particular methods are highlighted. Although many physical examination maneuvers have been described, reliance on the physical examination alone is insufficient for confirmation. Touted methods that appear failsafe, such as direct visualization of the ETT traversing the vocal cords have limitations, especially when dealing in the emergency setting accompanying a difficult to visualize airway. While carbon dioxide detection is an excellent confirmatory method, it is not infallible. Esophageal detection devices are useful as an alternative means of confirmation. New methods such as ultrasonic location of the ETT show promise but require further study. The clinician performing ETT insertion should have multiple confirmation methods that allow the practitioner to adapt to a variety of clinical situations, depending on local costs and availability. Finally, when the clinician still has uncertainty, or multiple tests give conflicting results, the availability of bronchoscopy at the bedside to visualize the carina through the ETT is useful.

Key Words: intubation • intratracheal • oximetry • carbon dioxide/analysis • critical care • auscultation

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 5, 283-292 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0885066609340501


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?