SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morganroth, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Grum, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morganroth, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Grum, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation

Melvin L. Morganroth

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI

Cyril M. Grum

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI

For most patients who require mechanical ventilation weaning and extubation is simple. In these patients a variety of strategies can be successful. In addition, sim ple criteria may predict when the patient is ready for extubation. For the small group of patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation, however, contro versy exists about how best to remove ventilator sup port by weaning, and available data are sparse. Much of the controversy has centered on T-piece weaning ver sus intermittent mandatory ventilation. To date no con trolled study has demonstrated the superiority of either intermittent mandatory ventilation or T-piece weaning in difficult-to-wean patients. In the evolution of this con troversy, concern has developed over the potential for increased inspiratory work and expiratory resistance that may be associated with certain intermittent manda tory ventilation systems. The possibility that significant inspiratory work may occur during assist-control venti lation has also been demonstrated. Respiratory muscle weakness and fatigue is likely important in failure to wean. Other possible causes are failure of the cardiovas cular system and impaired ability of the lung to carry out gas exchange. In this article we first examine criteria and techniques for weaning short-term ventilator pa tients. We then examine criteria to begin the weaning process in prolonged ventilation patients, potential causes of failure to wean, and techniques that can be used to remove ventilator support from patients who are difficult to wean. Much literature has been devoted to techniques and criteria for weaning and extubation of patients from mechanical ventilation. For most patients who require ventilatory support, weaning and extuba tion can be easily accomplished by a variety of tech niques [1-4]. At one referral center 77.2% of all surviving patients were weaned from the ventilator within 72 hours of the onset of mechanical ventila tion, and 91% were weaned within 7 days [1]. Less than 10% of ventilated patients potentially posed problems in weaning from mechanical ventilation. Similarly, at a community hospital, few surviving patients required prolonged ventilatory support [2]. In easy-to-wean patients, Sahn and Lakshminarayan [5] described simple criteria that are predictive of successful discontinuation of ventilator support. For the small group of patients who require pro longed mechanical ventilation, however, minimal data are available. In these patients criteria to deter mine weaning ability or which measurements to follow are not clearly defined. Furthermore, no controlled trials are available to compare the differ ent weaning techniques proposed. In this article we first address routine weaning of the patient who has not required prolonged ventilator support. We then examine the difficult-to-wean patient and dis cuss criteria to begin the weaning process, poten tial causes of failure to wean, and available weaning techniques.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 2, 109-120 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/088506668800300207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
G. N. Plost, S. C. Campbell, R. T. Vagedes, and B. Y. Shon
The Nonelastic Work of Breathing by Normal Humans Using Different Size Endotracheal Tubes
J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 1990; 5(1): 23 - 25.
[PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
H. M. Hollingsworth, M. R. Pratter, and R. S. Irwin
Acute Respiratory Failure in Pregnancy
J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 1989; 4(1): 11 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
F. J. Curley and R. S. Irwin
Mechanical Ventilation: Defining the Standard of Care
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 1988; 3(2): 67 - 68.
[PDF]



Advertisement