SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Judgmental Error in Intensive Care Practice

Gilbert M. Goldman

From the Department of Pediatrics, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL

Clinical judgment and its sources of error are inves tigated by studying the clinician's use of mental strate gies, heuristics, and biases. I review these findings, which have been obtained by analyzing medical judg ment in nonintensive care settings, with emphasis on appropriate applications for the intensivist. Particularly important in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting are sources of judgmental error introduced by using hy pothesis-driven reasoning and by attempting to intu itively mimic probabilistic reasoning. Such mental short- cuts are intended to aid the clinician, but are potential hindrances if misused. During ICU decision making, cer tain tendencies toward error are accentuated and must be recognized and guarded against. Conversely the in tensivist's valid judgments can best be defended if the context and constraints of ICU decision making are well understood. I analyze those tendencies and contexts shown to be important to intensive care and review opportunities to improve both the practice and under standing of clinical judgment in this setting.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 3, 93-103 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/088506669000500302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
E. P. Richards III
Living with Uncertainty: Information Theory and Critical Care Decision Making
J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 1990; 5(3): 91 - 92.
[PDF]



Advertisement