|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Implementation of a Handheld Electronic Point-of-Care Billing System Improved Efficiency in the Critical Care Unit
Brenda G. Fahy, MD, FCCM
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, bgfahy2{at}email.uky.edu
Jonathan T. Ketzler, MD
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Coding and billing are time consuming and important considerations for critical care practitioners. A 1-year prospective, observational study incorporated the use of a personal digital assistant and MDeverywhere software (Hauppauge, New York) for patient coding and billing. Twelve months of data were examined before electronic implementation (pre-elec) and compared with a 12-month period after implementation (post-elec) by using an unpaired t test or z test with P < .05 considered significant. The total number of charges was 2479 pre-elec and 2243 post-elec. The days from date of service to billing for services significantly decreased from 37.8 pre-elec to 12.4 post-elec (P < .001); days in accounts receivable significantly decreased from 92.0 to 73.0 (P < .001). The net collection rate increased from 44.7% pre-elec to 49.3% post-elec (P < .001). Duplicate charges significantly decreased from 5.0% pre-elec to 1.4% post-elec ( P < .001). The return on investment was 1.97-fold (197%). The initiation of personal digital assistant technology to facilitate billing and coding resulted in significant improvements.
Key Words: personal digital assistant PDA information technology billing and coding electronic critical care
References
- Shea S., DuMouchel W., Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventative care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3:399-409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wang SJ, Middleton B., Prosser LA, et al. A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med. 2003;114:397-403.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Baker ML Doctors using handhelds, but not for medicine. Available online at: http://www.coinsight.com/article2/0,1397,1779861,00.asp. Accessed December 31, 2006.
- Carroll AE, Christakis DA Pediatricians' use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants. Pediatrics. 2004:113;238-242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lapinsky SE, Weshler J., Mehta S., Varkul M., Hallett D., Stewart TE Handheld computers in critical care. Crit Care. 2001;5:227-231.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Martinez-Motta JC, Walker R., Stewart TE, Granton J., Abrahamson S., Lapinsky SE Critical care procedure logging using handheld computers. Crit Care. 2004;8:R336-R342.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BJM. 2004;328:1162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lapinsky SE, Wax R., Showalter R., et al. Prospective evaluation of an internet-linked handheld computer critical care knowledge access system. Crit Care. 2004;8:R414-R421.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fischer S., Stewart TE, Mehta S., Wax R., Lapinsky SE Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003:10;139-149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 6,
374-380 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0885066607307531

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|