This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0885066609332725v1 24/3/179    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reynolds, J. C. Articles by Rittenberger, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reynolds, J. C. Articles by Rittenberger, J. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Coronary Angiography Predicts Improved Outcome Following Cardiac Arrest: Propensity-adjusted Analysis

¹ University of Maryland
² University of Pittsburgh
³ University of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine
⁴ University of Pittsburgh, Department of Emergency Medicine

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rittenbergerjc{at}upmc.edu.

	Abstract

Objectives: Determine if clinical parameters of resuscitated patients predict coronary angiography (CATH) performance and if receiving CATH after cardiac arrest is associated with outcome. Introduction: CATH is associated with survival in patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) from ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia(VF/VT). Its effect on outcome in other cohorts is unknown. Methods: Chart review of resuscitated cardiac arrest patients between 2005 and 2007. Exclusion criteria: immediate withdrawal of care, hemodynamic collapse, or neurologic exam under sedation. Clinical parameters included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) arrest location, presenting rhythm, age, and acute ischemic ECG changes (new left bundle branch block or ST-elevation myocardial infarction-STEMI). Logistic regression identified clinical parameters predicting CATH. The association between CATH and good outcome (discharge home or to acute rehabilitation facility) was determined using logistic regression adjusting for likelihood of receiving CATH via propensity score. Result: Of the 241 patients, 96 (40%) received CATH. Significant disease (70% stenosis) of 1 coronary arteries was identified in 69% of patients including 57% of patients without acute ischemic ECG changes. Unadjusted predictors of CATH were sex, method of arrival, OHCA, presenting rhythm, acute ischemic ECG changes, and GCS. Propensity adjusted logistic regression demonstrated an association between CATH and good outcome (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.12, 4.19; P < 0.02). Conclusion: CATH is more likely to be performed in certain patients and identifies a significant number of high-grade stenoses in this population. Receiving CATH was independently associated with good outcome.

First published on March 25, 2009, doi:10.1177/0885066609332725

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2009;24:179.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?