Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sum-Ping, S. T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sum-Ping, S. T. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 1, 29-41 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0885066602239122

The Role of the {alpha}2-Adrenoceptor Agonist Dexmedetomidine in Postsurgical Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit

Eike Martin

Graham Ramsay

Jean Mantz

S. T. John Sum-Ping

Dexmedetomidine was evaluated for sedation of 401 postsurgical patients in this double-blind, randomized, placebocontrolled, multicenter trial. Dexmedetomidine or saline was started on arrival in the intensive care unit (ICU) (1.0 mcg/kg for 10 minutes), then titrated at 0.2 to 0.7 mcg/kg/h to effect. Patients could be given propofol if necessary. Morphine was administered for pain. Sixty percent of the dexmedetomidine patients required no other sedative to maintain an RSS >= 3; 21% required < 50 mg propofol. In contrast, 76% of the control group received propofol; 59% required >= 50 mg. Dexmedetomidine patients required significantly less morphine for pain relief (P < .001). Continuously given throughout the ICU stay, dexmedetomidine had no effect on respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, duration of weaning, or times to extubation. Nurses judged the dexmedetomidine patients were easier to manage. Later, fewer dexmedetomidine patients remembered pain or discomfort. The majority of dexmedetomidine patients maintained blood pressures within normal range, without rebound. Hypertension, atelectasis, and rigors occurred more frequently in the control group, while hypotension and bradycardia occurred more frequently in the dexmedetomidine group. Preoperative cardiovascular conditions were not risk factors for dexmedetomidine patients.

Key Words: {alpha}2-adrenoceptors • imidazoles • sympatholysis • anxiety • cardiac artery bypass graft • respiratory system


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
S. M. Corbett and J. A. Rebuck
Medication-Related Complications in the Trauma Patient
J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 2008; 23(2): 91 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
M. Klimek and M. M. Lacroix
The Safety and Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine When Used for More Than 24 Hours in an Adult Intensive Care Setting
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2007; 20(6): 474 - 477.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. M. Walz, M. Zayaruzny, and S. O. Heard
Airway Management in Critical Illness
Chest, February 1, 2007; 131(2): 608 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
P. M. Szumita, S. A. Baroletti, K. E. Anger, and M. E. Wechsler
Sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit: Evaluating the role of dexmedetomidine
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., January 1, 2007; 64(1): 37 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. A. McCutcheon, R. M. Orme, D. A. Scott, M. J. Davies, and D. P. McGlade
A comparison of dexmedetomidine versus conventional therapy for sedation and hemodynamic control during carotid endarterectomy performed under regional anesthesia.
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 668 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
V. S. Jorden, R. M Pousman, M. M Sanford, P. A. Thorborg, and M. P Hutchens
Dexmedetomidine Overdose in the Perioperative Setting
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2004; 38(5): 803 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]